郭力;

• 1:北京语言大学校长办公室

摘要(Abstract)：

许多二语习得的研究揭示了学习者的认知风格与个性因素能够影响其习得语言的表现。本研究调查了场依存/独立认知风格与中国学习者的英语交流表现之间的关系并指出其对英语教师的教学能够起到一定的指导作用。

关键词(KeyWords)： 场依存;场独立;交流表现

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Authors): 郭力;

参考文献(References)：

• [1] Berry,J.W. 1976. Human Ecology and Cognitive Style: Compara- tive Studies in Cultural and Psychological Adaptation. New York: Wiley
• [2] Brown,H.D. 1973. Affective Variables in Second Language Ac- quisition. Language Learning. 23:231-244
• [3] Carter,E. 1988. The Relationship of Field Dependence/Indepen- dence Cognitive Style to Spanish Language Achievement and Proficiency. Modern Language Journal. 72: 21-30
• [4] Chapelle,C. & P. Green. 1992. Field independence/dependence in Second Language Acquisition Research. Language Learning.42: 47-83
• [5] Chapelle,C. & C. Roberts. 1986. Field Independence and Ambi- guity Tolerance as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Sec- ond Language. Language Learning. 36:27-45
• [6] Ellis,R. 1989. Classroom Learning Style and Their Effect on Sec- ond Language Acquisition: A Study of two learners' System. Vol.17 No.2: 249-262
• [7] Gerstl,C. K. 2003. Relationships Among FD-FI Cognitive Learn- ing Style,Academic Achievement,Spanish Language Achieve- ment,and Foreign Language Reading Instructional Preferences of Middle School Students of Spanish Language. The Humanities and Social Sciences. 64:57-A
• [8] Hansen,J. & C. Stansfield. 1981. The Telationship of Field De- pendence and Independence Cognitive Style to Foreign Language Achievement. Language Learning. 31:349-367
• [9] Hansen-Strain,L. 1987. Cognitive Style and First Language Back- ground in Second Language Test Performance. TESOL Quarterly.21:565-569
• [10] Johnson,J.,& T. Rosano. 1993. Relation of Cognitive Style to Metaphor Interpretation and Second Language Proficiency. Ap- plied Psycholinguistics. 14: 159-175
• [11] Johnson,J.,S. Prior & M. Artuso. 2000. Field Dependence as a Factor in Second Language Communicative Production. Language Learning. 50:529-567
• [12] Littlemore,J. 2001. An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Cognitive Style and the Use of Communication Strategy. Applied Linguistics. Vol.22 No.2:241-265
• [13] Meng,Qingmao & Chang,Jianhua. 1988. On the Criteria of GEFT and Partial Revision of Models. In Xie,Sijun. & Zhang, HouChang et al (eds). Cognitive Style——An Experiment on the Dimensionality of Personality Beijing: Beijing Normal University
• [14] Naiman,N.,Frohlich,M.,Stern,H.,& Todesco,A. 1978. The Good Language Learner. Research in Education Series No.7. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
• [15] Saracho.O.N. 2003. Matching Teachers’and Students Cognitive Style. Early Child Development and Care. 173: 161-173
• [16] Skehan,P. 1989. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. New York: Edward Arnold
• [17] Witkin,H. & D.R. Goodenough. 1977. Field Dependence and interpersonal Behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 84:661-69
• [18] Witkin,H. & D.R. Goodenough. 1981. Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins. New York: International Universities Press
• [19] Witkin,H.,C.A. Moore,D. Goodenough & P. W. Cox. 1977. Field-dependent and field-independent Style and Their Educational Implication. Review of Educational Research. 47: 1-64.